IMO there are a couple things wrong with this comment.I'm not one to promote cancel culture but I'm glad he's resigned. It's time our politicians are held accountable for their constant "mistakes" and stop living a double standard. I wonder if Liberal Minister Pierre Arcand will follow suite.
If we didn't demand more when multi-million dollar contracts were handed out with kickbacks, AGs fired for not applying political influence or multiple ethics convictions then why the heck would we draw the line at someone taking a poorly timed vacation?
Good point about the cabinet position. They didn't break any laws but that doesn't mean they can't be taken to task for bad decisions. The same way you and I can get a RW or C&P without being charged for anything.IMO there are a couple things wrong with this comment.
Phillips only resigned his cabinet position. Still a MPP. Arcand doesn't hold a cabinet position to resign from.
Secondly neither of them have broke any laws other than common sense. For this there is no actual law broken.
Double standard? Nothing stopping most Canadians from going on trips if they choose.
The difference is that when contracts are handed out, people fired etc etc, we have no say in them, until the next election, when we can vote the bastards out.I refuse to be part of any vigilante "justice" to do with any COVID rules. We've been gaslit by the government and media to call the police on our neighbours for having a few consenting adults over for drinks, I'm not going to call for a politician to be fired over this. If we didn't demand more when multi-million dollar contracts were handed out with kickbacks, AGs fired for not applying political influence or multiple ethics convictions then why the heck would we draw the line at someone taking a poorly timed vacation?
IMO there are a couple things wrong with this comment.
Phillips only resigned his cabinet position. Still a MPP. Arcand doesn't hold a cabinet position to resign from.
Secondly neither of them have broke any laws other than common sense. For this there is no actual law broken.
Double standard? Nothing stopping most Canadians from going on trips if they choose.
With the media gaslighting us that everything the government does and says is right, and we should just shut up and follow along lest you be tarred and feathered or called a COVIDiot, that'll never happen. The statistics now don't support the draconian lockdowns we're facing. They did 8 months ago. 2/3 of all hospitalizations are 60+, 2/3 of ICU admissions are 60+, and 96.4% of deaths are 60+. Imagine what $300B would have done to support seniors to stay home, and surge staff to LTCs? Imagine what actual rapid testing at hospitals, care homes, prisons, and other communal living facilities would have done to stem outbreaks?The difference is that when contracts are handed out, people fired etc etc, we have no say in them, until the next election, when we can vote the bastards out.
With emergency covid-19 powers, governments at all levels have abrogated a half millenium of common law. The main reason for this is that they can.
I am far more concerned about government overreach, as opposed to who they offer up as a sacrificial lamb when they occasionally get blatantly caught and then offer some degree of contriteness. That satisfies some, but distracts from what our rights are under the original construct, and breeds compliance/complacency
We are violently agreeing.With the media gaslighting us that everything the government does and says is right, and we should just shut up and follow along lest you be tarred and feathered or called a COVIDiot, that'll never happen. The statistics now don't support the draconian lockdowns we're facing. They did 8 months ago. 2/3 of all hospitalizations are 60+, 2/3 of ICU admissions are 60+, and 96.4% of deaths are 60+. Imagine what $300B would have done to support seniors to stay home, and surge staff to LTCs? Imagine what actual rapid testing at hospitals, care homes, prisons, and other communal living facilities would have done to stem outbreaks?
There's not even a light at the end of the tunnel, no government (provincial or federal) will tell us what the vaccination rate criteria is to return to normal. If Ontario is at 6,000 cases per day, and the hospitalization rate is near 0 because the actual vulnerable demographic (60+) is vaccinated, we should be wide open with very few restrictions other than the standard hand washing and social distancing. Even masks at that point become moot, or we better mandate them for the rest of our lives during cold/flu season.
Great points, totally agree.With the media gaslighting us that everything the government does and says is right, and we should just shut up and follow along lest you be tarred and feathered or called a COVIDiot, that'll never happen. The statistics now don't support the draconian lockdowns we're facing. They did 8 months ago. 2/3 of all hospitalizations are 60+, 2/3 of ICU admissions are 60+, and 96.4% of deaths are 60+. Imagine what $300B would have done to support seniors to stay home, and surge staff to LTCs? Imagine what actual rapid testing at hospitals, care homes, prisons, and other communal living facilities would have done to stem outbreaks?
What makes you think they didn't?Law enforcement agencies should have foreseen these anti-vaxxers and far-right wing nuts' capabilities at this point:
"Capabilties"? Yea, standing around is definitely black ops...
I've always thought that Indian riot police/paramilitary bamboo batons as interesting
That looks like full contact criket.I've always thought that Indian riot police/paramilitary bamboo batons as interesting