Author
|
Topic: Where should the poppy REALLY be worn?
|
|
|
|
|
|
canuck
Veteran Member
Member # 109
Rate Member
|
posted 21 July 2021 02:46
There is an old southern US hymn that has as part of the refrain...."sometimes it causes me to tremble...tremble...tremble". The whole question of the poppy and where it should be worn is just one of those things that makes me tremble. In the military headress has always been seen as a mark of distinction, either to earn the rite to wear a particular form of headress, ie. the marroon beret, or the more elaborate bearskin of the guards. The military takes its symbols very seriously. If you look in the dress regs you will find a whole host of things we can wear in our hats....some of it would really make you wonder however, to some it is a matter of great pride. Imagine the humble leek...it is worn by some of the finest soldiers in the world....on their headress. In our understanding of showing respect and commeration, the headress playes a unique role, more so than placing things on the tunic. I couldn't imagine any other military simply changing the placement of a poppy because they thought others might question their show of support of the fallen. If, as a general officer, your convictions can be so easily shaken then mabey you should take off your headress and give it back. Your wearing of a uniform should speak volumes to others about the respect and understanding you have of the sacrifices made by our fallen. To think that changing the position of a poppy so that it better suits the requirements of NDHQ is a facile decision based on nothing but poor self image and, an improper understanding of how the military shows respect for itself and others. Such a decision really does cause me to tremble, not just for what it has changed but more importantly because those who made the change did so for the poorest of reasons. AS for me I think I will start putting roses, leeks, shamrocks, and anything else in the book just to prove a point....and as for the poppy. It goes next to the cap badge, not as a sign of disobedience but, as a mark of respect and an acknowledgement of a debt of rememberance. So, put that in your hat!
Posts: 7 | From: Port Stanley, Ontario, Canada | Registered: Jul 2000
|
|
|
bossi
Veteran Member
Member # 107
Member Rated:
|
posted 21 July 2021 12:54
Count me in for the side which favours wearing the poppy on our headdress ... where it belongs.Members of the military should, and must respect traditions which set them apart from the civilian populace (despite pressures from anarchists and politically correct, petty-minded bureaucrats). Hypothetically, if I were ever to have been in a situation whereby I was wearing a uniform at a meeting with a bunch of civvie pukes who were wearing their poppies on their lapels, I'm quite confident nobody in the room would have dared questioned me as to my commitment to the memory of our fallen comrades. The simple fact that I would have been loyal enough and professional enough to wear a uniform would have been adequate testament as to my respect for those who have gone before. "The Soldier Trade, if it is to mean anything at all, has to be anchored to an unshakeable code of honour. Otherwise, those of us who follow the drums become nothing more than a bunch of hired assassins walking around in gaudy clothes . . . a disgrace to God and mankind." - Carl von Clausewitz, 1832 Dileas Gu Brath M.A. Bossi, Esquire
Posts: 222 | From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada | Registered: Jun 2000
|
|
madorosh
Veteran Member
Member # 125
Member Rated:
|
posted 25 July 2021 02:14
This goes hand in hand with now being allowed to wear decorations on the overcoat on Rememberance Day, to match the practice of Legionaires who do the same thing. I don't see a problem in changing "traditions" when the rationale for the tradition has been long gone. Sergeants used to carry spontoons into battle, but I wouldn't expect to see one either in the field or on ceremonial parade. I therefore don't see a problem in displaying decorations on Rememberance Day. While the Canadian Army has never displayed decorations on overcoats in its history (as far as I know), other armies such as the French and the Russians have done so. As for poppies; Military dress standards come directly from the civilian world. The old Service Dress jacket is a direct relation to civilian lounge coats from the early years of the 20th Century. Spats worn by Highland regimens are a descendant of the "spatter dashers" that every gentleman wore with his shoes. The necktie in regimental colours, the collared shirt, padded shoulders, and many other items of dress come directly from civilian fashions. When viewed from that perspective, it makes a little more sense to relocate the poppy to the lapel, matching the practice of civilians, the majority of whom no longer wear hats. (Thank John F. Kennedy for that). I do recognize the importance of military headgear and all the traditions surrounding it (taking it off when on charge parade or in the mess, the wearing of maple leaves, cock feathers, shamrocks, leeks, roses, etc., according to tradition). I also agree with the comment that simply being in uniform should clue anyone in as to your dedication to this country and your respect for those who died in its service. But I don't see the relocation of the poppy as terribly troubling. If anything, it makes the poppy visible when the headdress is not worn. Even when worn on the glengarry or wedge cap, the poppy didn't stand out very much, and could only be viewed from one side. My problem is not so much the location as the method of attachment; why the Legion hasn't changed the stick pin to a push pin and "dammit" backing, I'll never understand. Working in combats with the stick pin over your heart can be both painful and troubling (when the damn thing falls out and you have to go buy another one lest someone find you "improperly dressed"). Perhaps a solution to this would be a compromise - wear the poppy in the headdress, and when headdress is not worn, wear it on the lapel? Then when you go to a meeting or work in an office, your poppy would be visible - otherwise, it is in your headdress where traditionalists would prefer it.
Posts: 43 | From: Calgary, AB | Registered: Jun 2000
|
|
|
russm
Veteran Member
Member # 139
Rate Member
|
posted 27 July 2021 12:43
Actually, the reason the poppy position was changed, I am assured by the head cheese of the Legion at the national level, was because the veterans had made an issue of it. I know this because I e-mailed him about it 18 months or so ago and his response was quite pointed. I have no doubt that our CDS simply bowed to the pressure from the Legion members and issued the order accordingly.My original point was that we have been wearing the poppy on our headdress for a great many years (longer, in fact, than the vast majority of our surviving veterans have been alive). That they should suddenly decide that the headdress of the serving members is not the appropriate place for the poppy to be worn is their prerogative. However, I don't feel we should jump every time someone says we should. I think we should first pay some regard to our traditions (which are rapidly being stripped from us) and to the earlier generations of veterans who are now gone and who were, apparently, quite happy with us wearing the poppy on our headdress. Nope, I have to say that I will not be issuing any seditious orders. There is a right way and a wrong way of doing things and as soon as you stop playing by the rules of the establishment, not only are you no longer a player, but you are also in very hot water. It is also somewhat ridiculous to suggest that this issue is important enough to forsake our oaths of allegiance. My suggestion, is to make our voices heard on the issue, either via the chain of command, or to our respective MPs and legion reps, so we may obtain a democratic solution. In the mean time we bite the bullet and soldier on. To do otherwise is an affront to our forebears. Dorosh's idea is a quite reasonable solution in my mind, though it could be a pain in the neck entering and exiting buildings, etc. where headdress is not worn. RM
Posts: 21 | From: | Registered: Jul 2000
|
|
|